A defined use case
We clarify what blockchain adds to the product, what information needs recording and which responsibilities remain with each system.
Engine · Blockchain and connected systems
Connect your product with blockchain where it makes sense.
We develop integrations, automation and components for products that interact with blockchain. We start with the function you need and the responsibilities that connection introduces.

The starting point
A transaction needs to appear in the interface, be confirmed and be reconciled with the system. Keys, permissions and providers are also part of the product. We design that relationship between the chain and your application.
We clarify what blockchain adds to the product, what information needs recording and which responsibilities remain with each system.
We connect states and operations with an experience that explains what is pending, what is confirmed and what needs attention.
We identify network dependencies, permissions and key management. Technical decisions can be reviewed before moving forward.
From the objective to concrete work
A good fit when you need to connect an existing system, process events or develop an interface that interacts with contracts. It also suits teams assessing the technical fit before building.
Define my next stepFlows between the application and blockchain, the data model and dependencies. Assessment of what should run on-chain and off-chain.
Application and automation components that interact with the chosen network. Languages and tools depend on the ecosystem.
Processing of events, confirmations and errors as required. Design of reconciliation with the product's information.
Validation in suitable environments and documentation of dependencies. Specialist security review is agreed under a separate scope.
The scope depends on the network, contracts and assets involved. Developing an integration does not itself constitute a security audit or replace any regulatory review the product may need.
Código Palanca applied to your project
The initial conversation covers the use case, network and systems involved. We define a focused test or intervention and the risks that need separate review.
We start with the business requirement and compare it with alternatives. We define what needs to be verified or shared between participants.
We validate a defined flow with the contracts and services involved. We review intermediate states and dependencies before expanding it.
We agree on permissions, monitoring and incident response. Launch requires checking the conditions of the specific environment.
Before you start
Decisions worth clarifying before building.
Yes. We review its architecture, the network and the contracts involved. We define the interaction, state handling and responsibility for each piece of data before development.
The choice depends on the network and function. Rust can be used in services or compatible ecosystems; Solidity in contracts on networks that use it. A product can combine several languages.
Development testing is part of the agreed scope. A specialist security review needs its own assets, criteria, owners and deliverables; we arrange this through our cybersecurity service.
Yes. We review who participates, what needs verifying and what trust the system requires. The decision may be to build a focused trial or address the case with a conventional architecture.
Let’s discuss your next step
Tell us about the use case and systems involved. We will review the fit before defining the implementation.